Tolkien on Death and Eucatastrophe
Dec 28th, 2009 | By Andrew Preslar | Category: Blog PostsEvery story features an action, carried out by a protagonist, who is hindered by an antagonist, which makes for an essential conflict, the development and resolution of which constitutes the basic structure of the story. The larger the scope of the action, the more potential a story has for “greatness.” Every human life, on this model, is very much a great story. The individual is the protagonist, and the enemy is death.
J.R.R. Tolkien appreciated the pivotal role of death in a story:
In a private conversation that contributed to the Christian conversion of C. S. Lewis, Tolkien presented Lewis with an understanding of the Gospel of the Incarnation as the “Christian myth.” Tolkien later summarized this conception:
The Gospels contain a fairy-story, or a story of a larger kind which embraces all the essence of fairy-stories. They contain many marvels — peculiarly artistic, beautiful, and moving: ‘mythical in their perfect, self-contained significance; and among the marvels is the greatest and most complete conceivable eucatastrophe. But this story has entered History and the primary world; the desire and aspiration of sub-creation has been raised to the fulfillment of Creation.1
Tolkien defined “eucatastrophe” as the opposite of tragedy and the highest function of the fairy-story. It is the “Consolation of the Happy Ending.”2 The eucatastrophe is the moment in a story when “we get a piercing glimpse of joy, and heart’s desire, that for a moment passes outside the frame, rends indeed the very web of story, and lets a gleam come through.”3
The Assumption of Enoch was a eucatastrophe in an otherwise monotonous Genesis Chapter Five– “and he died, and he died, and he died,” and on and on until, “and he was not, for God took him.” The feast of St. John the Evangelist serves (in my mind, at least) a similar purpose in the days following Christmas. The Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary is another eucatastrophic glimpse of our heart’s desire. All of this “looks forward, or backward … to the Great Eucatastrophe.”4 Victory over death is, of course, the great action of the Gospel story. The protagonist is Almighty God, born of a Virgin. The denouement is the union of man and God in life everlasting.
It is no coincidence that Christmas Day is followed by the feasts of St. Stephen, the Holy Innocents and St. Thomas of Canterbury. The thing about the Gospel is, the death of Christ catches up all of these deaths, and transforms them into vehicles of eternal glory.
Who can count the dust of Jacob, or number the fourth part of Israel? Let me die the death of the righteous, and let my last end be like his!
Our priest at St. Basil the Great Ukrainian Catholic Church said that Christmas is like a little Pascha, a winter Easter. The Church Year is in full swing, for Christ is born among us! Epiphany-tide will bring us to Lent, and that is like the life of Christ. Our Lord fasted, therefore, we fast. Our Lord endured death for all, therefore, we can endure our own deaths. Christmastide is a giddy moment in the story, but the conflict still remains, as attested by the commemorations within the octave. Take up your cross and follow Me. Christ did not suffer and die so that we would not have to suffer and die.
These all died in faith, not having received the promises, but having seen them afar off, and were persuaded of them, and embraced them, and confessed that they were strangers and pilgrims on the earth. For they that say such things declare plainly that they seek a country. And truly, if they had been mindful of that country from whence they came out, they might have had opportunity to have returned. But now they desire a better country, that is, an heavenly: wherefore God is not ashamed to be called their God: for he hath prepared for them a city….
Wherefore seeing we also are compassed about with so great a cloud of witnesses, let us lay aside every weight, and the sin which doth so easily beset us, and let us run with patience the race that is set before us, looking unto Jesus the author and finisher of our faith; who for the joy that was set before him endured the cross, despising the shame, and is set down at the right hand of the throne of God. For consider him that endured such contradiction of sinners against himself, lest ye be wearied and faint in your minds. Ye have not yet resisted unto blood, striving against sin.
The Resurrection has been accomplished. But the Resurrection is not already past. Therefore, let us have hope, and be vigilant. The Norsemen and Anglo-Saxons who inspired Tolkien were not afraid of a good death. No one need fear a good death. This too, is of the Eucatastrophe. Like so much else in our faith, death has become something of a paradox. It is not desired for its own sake, but we would gladly embrace it, like so many who have gone before us, for the sake of the testimony of the Gospel, that is, for the sake of Christ, in the hope of a better resurrection. Those little babies slain by Herod will rise up in the resurrection of the dead, and proclaim the name of their Saviour, Jesus Christ, King of kings and Lord of lords.
O God, whose praise the martyed Innocents on this day confessed, not by speaking, but by dying: destroy in us all the evils of sin, that our life also may proclaim by deeds Thy faith which our tongue professes. Through our Lord Jesus Christ, Thy Son, who liveth and reigneth with Thee, in the unity of the Holy Ghost, God, world without end. Amen.
__________


I might as well comment that the thing that brought my mind round to this was re-reading Tolstoy’s Anna Karenina. The thing that prevents such reflections from becoming morbid, or melodramatic, is, of course, hope in God. The alternatives are despair, which can only lead to futile rage or morbid acceptance of the finality of death, or an unreflective life, in which god is one’s belly.
Also, I have found something new in the Catholic faith, wherein the dead are very much a part of the life of the Church, by means of Holy Tradition (“the democracy of the dead”) and the Communion of Saints. This is one of the biggest, and most welcome, changes from ceasing to be Protestant. I can pray for all of the people I love.
Andrew,
You continue to amaze me. With so much scholarly intellect to wrap one’s tiny brain around (I speak of my own) at CTC, you manage once again to intersect that intellect with beauty. Like Tolkien, your words bring such wonderful imagery,to those of us who think in pictures, with vivid, bright and colorful scenery.
To some these things seem silly almost, but to others, it’s the joy and hope of Our Lord we see. Yes, Anna Karenina could cause horrible despair. What waste grasping for happiness and losing it like a hand full of sand.
Thank you for the this beautiful writing today. I too understand this beauty of Communion With The Saints. They are no more dead than Our Lord. There are just some who do not have their ressurrected bodies, but their souls are with The Church Triumphant. We do not commune or “conjure up” the dead. How foolish to have thought that!
Tolkien knew the beauty of the fullness of this faith and anyone that reads him can plainly see it.
His dear Mother was rejected by her protestant family for converting to The Catholic faith, but she didn’t waver. May we all be as strong and committed to This Faith in times of anti-Catholic rhetoric and attack from the secular world as well as those from our separated brothers and sisters who do not see our common joy.
May the peace of Christ be with you, Andrew!
Hey Teri,
And with thy spirit.
Merry Christmas. Tolkien was a brilliant and complex man. Watching that video, with the scene of the warriors laying a fallen companion to rest, is especially poignant when one considers that Tolkien lost all of his dearest friends during the first World War. As his son Christopher wrote, the sprawling legendarium of Middle Earth was the vehicle of Tolkien’s profoundest reflections upon life, art, death and the unknown. He was keenly aware that his fictional work could easily be considered a huge waste of time, and he was afraid that, in its unfinished condition (i.e., the Silmarillion materials), it would prove to have been just that. But such fears did not have the final word, at least, not in the logic of sub-creation as developed by Tolkien in the essay cited in my article, and in his short story, Leaf by Niggle. All of our efforts, no matter how unworthy, can be redeemed.
Our Lord Jesus, by his heroic death, has gilded the Cross with gold, and as such it is the symbol of our unconditional victory. The world really does get turned on its head in the Church.
So perfectly worded and so timely. During this season of Christmas when many of our separated brothers and sisters call the birth of Our Lord – pagan worship, we are reminded that He really does turn everything on it’s head!
All of man’s search for God was shown to be ultimately fullfilled in Our Lord. HE made creation and it is now all subjected to Him. From a Roman execution symbol of terror such as the cross, to the Celtic Cross (dear to my Scotch/Irish heart). All were “pagan” except the Jewish believers until Our Lord tore the veil and beckoned us to come. He is The Redeemer. He Redeems all and fully.
Thanks for such a wonderful blog post. I just love Tolkien! His work is more appreciated now than ever. Our beloved Catholic storyteller!
PAX,
Teri