<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Was the Fall Under God&#8217;s Providence?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.calledtocommunion.com/2009/11/was-the-fall-of-man-under-gods-providence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.calledtocommunion.com/2009/11/was-the-fall-of-man-under-gods-providence/</link>
	<description>Reformation meets Rome</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:00:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.calledtocommunion.com/2009/11/was-the-fall-of-man-under-gods-providence/comment-page-1/#comment-4557</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 19:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calledtocommunion.com/?p=3154#comment-4557</guid>
		<description>Thanks Tim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Tim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim A. Troutman</title>
		<link>http://www.calledtocommunion.com/2009/11/was-the-fall-of-man-under-gods-providence/comment-page-1/#comment-4556</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim A. Troutman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 18:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calledtocommunion.com/?p=3154#comment-4556</guid>
		<description>Yes a Catholic must affirm a literal Adam and Eve per &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/pius_xii/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-xii_enc_12081950_humani-generis_en.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Humani Generis&lt;/a&gt;.   This doesn&#039;t mean that all aspects of the creation narrative must be taken literally, but at least this particular one must be understood literally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes a Catholic must affirm a literal Adam and Eve per <a href="http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/pius_xii/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-xii_enc_12081950_humani-generis_en.html" rel="nofollow">Humani Generis</a>.   This doesn&#8217;t mean that all aspects of the creation narrative must be taken literally, but at least this particular one must be understood literally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.calledtocommunion.com/2009/11/was-the-fall-of-man-under-gods-providence/comment-page-1/#comment-4546</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 13:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calledtocommunion.com/?p=3154#comment-4546</guid>
		<description>Tim,

Does a Catholic have to affirm the historicity of  &lt;i&gt;&#039;adam&lt;/i&gt; or may one simply affirm the theological reality (sin) of which the fall narrative speaks?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim,</p>
<p>Does a Catholic have to affirm the historicity of  <i>&#8216;adam</i> or may one simply affirm the theological reality (sin) of which the fall narrative speaks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

